|
|
Post by rexjt7 on Feb 5, 2011 11:26:17 GMT 8
i think kaya maganda stats ni ferrer and esperanza dahil nacoconvert ng mga spikers nya yung mga sets...unlike kay dmac...di masyado nacoconvert to points ang mga sets nya..tama ba
|
|
|
|
Post by lander on Feb 5, 2011 16:08:54 GMT 8
Running sets are borne out of not-so-perfect receive of a service ball or a pass ball. In a running set, the setter has to a) go after the ball to b) set it almost perfectly to his spikers. It is difficult to execute because the setter is out of her usual setting stance.... Coaches and trainors often do running seeting drills on their setters to prepare them on any type of passed ball...Good setters trained to do running sets can give quick sets at his front or at the back very well. This aside from the high sets on both side or on the middle. Still sets - could be that the setter has a prefectly received first ball and had set the ball with minimal movement on the setting position. Share lang po. Nope. I have to disagree with this explanation. While the words 'Still' and 'Running' can mislead people in thinking that it's about the setter when in fact it's the blockers of the opposing team that is referred to in here. Running sets are sets that are set by the setter to an attacker and that attacker only faces a single or no block from the opposing team. Still sets, on the other hand, are sets that are set to an attacker and that attacker faces 2 or 3 blockers from the opposing team. Still sets vs. running sets actually highlight the ability of a setter to fool the opposing blockers of the other team. While reception plays a big part to make the setting chores easier, the still sets and running sets DON'T emphasize in the movement of the setter at all. Hope this clarifies things up. P.S. I used to think before that still sets and running sets depended on the movement of the setter when setting, until I read this article: usavolleyball.org/news/2008/08/01/u-s-men-have-little-time-to-reflect-on-victory/2853Scroll down kayo sa mga 'Best Players' na part, at nandun yung explanation. aaahhh... ok... makes sense... |
|
deejay_05
Senior Forumer 3
Be Kind. Be Wise. Have a Heart
Posts: 11,262 
|
Post by deejay_05 on Feb 6, 2011 14:35:46 GMT 8
Nope. I have to disagree with this explanation. While the words 'Still' and 'Running' can mislead people in thinking that it's about the setter when in fact it's the blockers of the opposing team that is referred to in here. Running sets are sets that are set by the setter to an attacker and that attacker only faces a single or no block from the opposing team. Still sets, on the other hand, are sets that are set to an attacker and that attacker faces 2 or 3 blockers from the opposing team. Still sets vs. running sets actually highlight the ability of a setter to fool the opposing blockers of the other team. While reception plays a big part to make the setting chores easier, the still sets and running sets DON'T emphasize in the movement of the setter at all. Hope this clarifies things up. P.S. I used to think before that still sets and running sets depended on the movement of the setter when setting, until I read this article: usavolleyball.org/news/2008/08/01/u-s-men-have-little-time-to-reflect-on-victory/2853Scroll down kayo sa mga 'Best Players' na part, at nandun yung explanation. aaahhh... ok... makes sense... thanks for the correction... appreciate it.. |
|
|
|
Post by barbarix on Feb 7, 2011 18:51:57 GMT 8
thanks for the correction... appreciate it.. no prob.  |
|
