|
Post by paolov16 on Feb 18, 2011 23:54:09 GMT 8
lagpas na sa 7 yr out of HS rule si Cruz. kaya hindi na pwede. un ang alam ko.. pa-confirm nalang
|
|
|
Post by observer on Feb 19, 2011 0:06:15 GMT 8
ADU is still on the 3rd place even if ADMU were able to reach the 2ng game and lost. the teams who entered the semis, the standing is back to zero, ang purpose sa elimination is the ranking, no. 1 and 2 seed has the advantage over there opponent which is no. 3 and 4 seeds through the twice advantage yan ang consequences if ur in the top standing.. if ever no. 1 seed losses to no. 4 seed twice, so automatically no. 1 seed drop to no. 4. If in the semis or final4 everything is back to zero (0), what's the justification of ADU retaining the 3rd spot if it has 0 win while ADMU, let's say, gets 1 win?
|
|
|
Post by literate on Feb 19, 2011 1:57:50 GMT 8
ADU is still on the 3rd place even if ADMU were able to reach the 2ng game and lost. the teams who entered the semis, the standing is back to zero, ang purpose sa elimination is the ranking, no. 1 and 2 seed has the advantage over there opponent which is no. 3 and 4 seeds through the twice advantage yan ang consequences if ur in the top standing.. if ever no. 1 seed losses to no. 4 seed twice, so automatically no. 1 seed drop to no. 4. If in the semis or final4 everything is back to zero (0), what's the justification of ADU retaining the 3rd spot if it has 0 win while ADMU, let's say, gets 1 win? They were seeded higher upon entering the semi-finals. That's it.
|
|
|
Post by observer on Feb 20, 2011 1:30:45 GMT 8
They were seeded higher upon entering the semi-finals. That's it. So why do they say No.1 drops to No.4 if it loses twice? In this scenario, between No.1 and No.3, it's still No.1 who was seeded higher upon entering the semis.
|
|